Inductive Logic:
In the above, the conclusion is proven by the afore-mentioned observations. The observations—taken with the physical senses: sight, smell, sound, taste, touch—are the evidence.
Deductive Logic:
From sensual observations, assumptions are created. Then from assumptions and observations conclusions are drawn.
Senses--> Induction-->Deduction
Circular Logic:
No observed evidence exists to support the assumption. Instead, an assumption is made with unobserved evidence.
Conclusion: B (conclusion)
Therefore:
A then B
Therefore:
Assumption: if A then B (major premise)
No observed evidence exists to support the assumption: if A then B. The only evidence that exists to support the assumption, if A then B, is the unobserved evidence delineated above. A then B was never observed.
Observations:
X then Y
X then Y
X then Y
X then Y
X then Y
X then Y
X then Y
X then Y
X then Y
X then Y
Therefore:
Assumption: if X then Y (major premise)
In the above, the conclusion is proven by the afore-mentioned observations. The observations—taken with the physical senses: sight, smell, sound, taste, touch—are the evidence.
Deductive Logic:
Assumption: if X then Y (major premise)
Observation: X (minor premise)
Conclusion: Y (conclusion)
From sensual observations, assumptions are created. Then from assumptions and observations conclusions are drawn.
Senses--> Induction-->Deduction
Circular Logic:
No observed evidence exists to support the assumption. Instead, an assumption is made with unobserved evidence.
Assumption: if A then B (major premise)
Observation: A (minor premise)Conclusion: B (conclusion)
Therefore:
A then B
Therefore:
Assumption: if A then B (major premise)
No observed evidence exists to support the assumption: if A then B. The only evidence that exists to support the assumption, if A then B, is the unobserved evidence delineated above. A then B was never observed.
No comments:
Post a Comment